• Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to search bar
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Log Out

  • NCAC
  • Home
  • About CALiO™
  • FAQs–Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Bibliographies
    • Fact Sheets
    • Legal Guidebook
    • Regional CAC's & VOCAA Partner Agencies
    • Events
Press enter or spacebar to select a desired language.
NCAC CALiO: Child Abuse Library Online
CALiO™
the National Children’s Advocacy Center
  • NCAC
  • Home
  • About CALiO™
  • FAQs–Contact Us
    • Bibliographies
    • Fact Sheets
    • Legal Guidebook
    • Regional CAC's & VOCAA Partner Agencies
    • Events
Press enter or spacebar to select a desired language.
  • Log Out

Search CALiO™

Registered CAC and Chapter members can log in to search the full collection.

    Open Access CALiO Collection
    Registered User Access
    • Search Tips (TBD)
    • Bibliographies
    • Fact Sheets
    • NCAC Virtual Training Center

    Episode 8: Ground Rules-Benefits of Including Interview Instruction in the Forensic Interview

    Season
    Season 2
    Date
    November 10, 2020
    Watch Now
    https://www.youtube.com/embed/lpGJOz-z7Cg
    Links
    Download Infoprint
    More to Read

    Log into CALiO™ or contact the librarians to obtain publications.

    Anderson, G. D., Anderson, J. N., & Krippner, M. (2016). "I only want to know what you know": The use of orienting messages during forensic interviews and their effects of child behavior. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 25(6), 655-673. DOI:10.1080/10538712.2016.1194356

    Brown, D. A., Lewis, C. N., Lamb, M. E., Gwynne, J., Kitto, O., & Stairmand, M. (2019). Developmental differences in children's learning and use of forensic ground rules during an interview about an experienced event. Developmental Psychology, 55(8), 1626-1639. DOI:10.1037/dev0000756

    Brubacher, S. P., Poole, D. A., & Dickinson, J. J. (2015). The use of ground rules in investigative interviews with children: A synthesis and call for research. Developmental Review, 36, 15-33. DOI:10.1016/j.dr.2015.01.001

    Danby, M. C., Brubacher, S. P., Sharman, S. J., & Powell, M. B. (2015). The effects of practice on children's ability to apply ground rules in a narrative interview. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33(4), 446-458. DOI:10.1002/bsl.2194

    Dickinson, J. J., Brubacher, S. P., & Poole, D. A. (2015). Children's performance on ground rules questions: Implications for forensic interviewing. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 87-97. DOI:10.1037/lhb0000119

    Earhart, B., La Rooy, D. J., Brubacher, S. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2014). An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children. Behavioral Science & the Law, 32(6), 746-761. DOI:10.1002/bsl.2141

    Fessinger, M. B., McWilliams, K., Bakth, F. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2021). Setting the ground rules: Use and practice of ground rules in child forensic interviews. Child Maltreatment, 26(1), 126-132. DOI:10.1177/1077559520910783

    Lyon, T. D., & Evans, A. D. (2014). Young children's understanding that promising guarantees performance: The effects of age and maltreatment. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 162-170. DOI:10.1037/lhb000061

    Magnusson, M., Emberg, E., Landstrom, S., & Akehurst, L. (2020). Forensic interviewer's experiences of interviewing children of different ages. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 26(10), 967-989. DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2020.1742343

    Malloy, L. C., Katz, C., Lamb, M. E., & Mungo, A. P. (2015). Children's requests for clarification in investigative interviews about suspected sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 323-333. DOI:10.1002/acp.3101

    Waterman, A. H., & Blades, M. (2013). The effect of delay and individual differences on children's tendency to guess. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 215-226. DOI:10.1037/a0028354

    Return to Collection
    Takeaway Tuesday
    • NCAC
    • Home
    • About CALiO™
    • FAQs–Contact Us
      • Bibliographies
      • Fact Sheets
      • Legal Guidebook
      • Regional CAC's & VOCAA Partner Agencies
      • Events

    This website is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this website (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided).

    Copyright © 2021
    Powered By EBSCO Stacks 4.0.121.2 Staff Login
    • Translation Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use